The tree · Launch · Happens to the world · Could be decided within 1 to 5 years

A fully reusable heavy launcher flies 100 orbital missions in one calendar year

Not yet

Launch cost is set less by the rocket than by how often the same rocket flies. A fully reusable heavy launcher (both stages recovered and reflown) reaching a hundred orbital flights in a single year is the point at which mass to orbit stops being the constraint on everything downstream: stations, habitats, and lunar supply all assume it.

The test: what counts as it having happened

In one calendar year, a launch vehicle rated for at least fifty tonnes to low Earth orbit, whose first and second stages are both designed for recovery and reuse, completes at least 100 orbital launches, counting only flights that reached orbit, with both stages recovered on at least half of the qualifying flights and at least one flight reusing a previously flown first and second stage. Test flights that reached orbit count; suborbital flights and failures do not.

Settled by: Public orbital launch logs, checked against the operator's own flight manifest

The odds, by how long I live

baselineto 2071 ± 8moderateto 2080strongto 2095radicalto 2136openno deadline
85%90%93%95%96%

Each column is a different guess at how long I live, from current trends (baseline) to open-ended. The number is the chance this happens before that deadline, assuming everything it depends on happens first. As of September 19th, 2026.

Why these numbers: The partially reusable predecessor passed a hundred flights a year in 2023; full reuse plus a constellation and lunar manifest gets there within the decade, and forty-five years is a long time to miss.

What this one is worth

If this happened tomorrow and nothing else changed, the chance that I live and work off Earth by 2071 goes from 0.5% to 0.5% (too small to tell apart from chance). If it turned out no, the same number goes to 0.0% (−0.5 points).

Longevity scenario baseline2071 ± 8moderate2080strong2095radical2136openno deadline
The headline as it stands 0.5%1.2%3.8%11%15%
If this settled yes now 0.5%1.2%3.9%11%15%
If this settled no now 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%

This is what the site says in advance, before the thing happens. When it does, the ledger entry that records it quotes this figure beside what actually followed, so a reader can see whether the prediction held. Worked out at the run 2026-10-11-scan by holding this step at each outcome in turn and playing the whole tree out again, 20,000 times per scenario. That is a throw of the dice, so a move smaller than about 0.10 points is inside the noise rather than a finding.

What the ledger says about this step

The last 3 checks

Once a week the tree is read against the news, node by node, against the test above. Open a line to see what that week held. Every check ever made on this node is on the Radar page.

  • 2026-11-01 Nothing new

    Starship has flown 14 times as of mid-October 2026 with Flight 14 on September 28th, 2026 the first orbital flight, and no fully reusable vehicle is near 100 orbital launches in a year. Nothing in the leaf window since October 25th, 2026 bears on the criterion.

  • 2026-10-25 Nothing new

    Nothing new bearing on the criterion in the week to October 25th, 2026. Starship has flown about three times in 2026 (Flight 13 on July 24th, 2026, Flight 14 on September 28th, 2026), no ship has been reflown, and SpaceX's stated aim is weekly launches in the first half of 2027, far from 100 qualifying launches in a calendar year.

  • 2026-10-18 Nothing new

    Nothing new in the week to October 18th, 2026. Starship flies a few times a year, Flight 15 is not expected before mid-November, and no ship has been reflown, so 100 qualifying launches in a year is far off.

Revisions

DateFieldFromToWhy
2026-09-19 resolution 'heavy' undefined; a vehicle designed for reuse but flown expendable would have counted rated for at least fifty tonnes to low Earth orbit, both stages recovered on at least half of the qualifying flights, and at least one flight reusing a previously flown first and second stage Step 27 outside-model review, item 56 (docs/reviews/2026-09-19-rulings.md): the node's point is flight rate driven by reuse, and as written a hundred expendable flights of a reusable design counted. Decided September 19th, 2026.

Notes

Written September 8th, 2026 as the schema's worked example. Probability comes in Phase 3. Edge drawn at step 7: a hundred flights a year of a fully reusable launcher needs both stages to have been recovered at least once.


Think this estimate is wrong? Here's how to tell me, and what happens next. The record itself is data/L-launch.toml in the public repository.